4 ways to automate key and alarm handovers

Liam Jones

Liam Jones

Founder, Pilla App

Date Modified

3 June 2026

I'm Liam Jones, founder of Pilla and a qualified management consultant. I've helped hundreds of businesses set up workflows, and in this article I'm going to show you four real examples of how to set up your key and alarm handovers. I'll start from the simplest and then add some more powerful options. You can open up each template in our workflow builder playground as a starting point and experiment for yourself. If you have any suggestions or you need some help, you can email me directly.

The workflows at a glance

  • #1 - The basic check. The same short check the cleaner runs twice: once when they take the key, once when they lock up and hand it back.
  • #2 - With written guidance. The same shape with guidance panels on the lock-up order and what to do if the alarm will not set.
  • #3 - With photo evidence. The guided check plus a photo of the locked door or armed alarm panel, so there is proof the site was secured.
  • #4 - With photo and signature. The photo-evidenced check plus a signature, so every key handover is signed by the person who held it.

Article Content

#1 - The basic check

Who it's for: Cleaners holding a single site key, where one person opens up and locks down on their own.

Available on: Basic.

What it is: A key and alarm handover is a short record of who holds a site key and whether the building was left secure. The clever part is that it is one check the cleaner runs twice in the same visit: once on arrival when they take the key, and once on the way out when they lock up and hand it back. They pick which one it is, type the key or fob number and their name, and on the way out confirm the alarm was set and the doors were locked. Each completion is one stamped record, so a visit leaves two: a "key taken" at the start and a "locked up" at the end.

In practice: Take a sole cleaner who holds the only key to a small accountancy office. At 6am they open the canvas, pick "Taking the key", type "front door fob 04" and their name, and submit. The two lock-up steps do not apply yet, so they mark them "Not applicable". Server timestamp captured. Two hours later, finished and on their way out, they run it again, pick "Returning the key", confirm "Yes, set" on the alarm and "Yes, locked" on the building, and submit. Two stamped records for one visit, both on a phone, no key book hanging by the door.

Why it works: The record is the proof. The cleaning itself does not change. What changes is that there is now a time-stamped log of who took the key and a separate confirmation that the alarm was armed and the doors locked before they left. If the office is found open the next morning, the manager can see who last held the key and whether they logged it as locked, instead of working back through a paper book or a group chat.

Steps included:

  • 1 single choice (2 options: Taking the key, Returning the key)
  • 1 text input (key or fob ID)
  • 1 text input (who holds it)
  • 1 single choice (alarm set on exit: Yes set, Not applicable)
  • 1 single choice (building locked: Yes locked, Not applicable)

When to upgrade:

  1. Add written guidance (#2) once the key passes between more than one cleaner, so the lock-up order is the same whoever is last out.
  2. Add photo evidence (#3) once the client wants to see the building was actually secured, and a tick alone is not enough.
  3. Add a signature (#4) once the contract is key-holding and each handover needs a name signed against it.

#2 - With written guidance

Who it's for: Firms where keys pass between several operatives, so the person locking up tonight may not be the one who opened up this morning.

Available on: Standard.

What it is: The basic check plus two guidance panels woven through the canvas. The first sits at the top and sets out the lock-up order: windows, then doors, then alarm, then log the key as returned, done in that order so nothing gets missed in a rush to leave. The second sits at the end and covers the awkward case, when the alarm throws a fault and will not set. A cleaner who has never locked this site before gets the same routine in their head as the supervisor who set it up, without a phone call.

In practice: Take a contract cleaning firm covering eight retail units in a shopping park, where a small crew rotates across the sites night to night. Tonight a stand-in is closing a homeware unit they have only opened before, never locked. The top panel walks them through it: check the windows, lock the doors, set the alarm, then log the key. They get to the alarm and a zone will not clear. The second panel tells them not to just leave it, but to call the duty manager before they lock up. They make the call, the manager talks them through resetting the zone, and the unit is left properly secured instead of armed-with-a-fault or wide open.

What it adds to the previous template:

  1. A "lock-up routine" panel that fixes the order, windows then doors then alarm then key, so the last one out does not skip a step.
  2. An "if the alarm won't set" panel that tells the cleaner to call the duty manager rather than leave a site unsecured or armed with a fault.
  3. A shared standard for what locking up means, so a stand-in and a regular do it the same way.

Why it works: Written guidance sits inline at the moment the cleaner is about to act. The stand-in reads the lock-up order the first time they close the unit, and the alarm-fault panel is right there at the exact step where the alarm refuses to set. It is not a briefing they half-heard when they joined. It is on the screen at the moment of the task, every time.

Steps included:

  • 1 guidance panel (the lock-up routine)
  • 1 single choice (taking or returning the key)
  • 1 text input (key or fob ID)
  • 1 text input (who holds it)
  • 1 single choice (alarm set on exit)
  • 1 single choice (building locked)
  • 1 guidance panel (if the alarm won't set)

When to upgrade: Move to Key & Alarm Handover #3 once a tick alone is not enough to satisfy the client. Once they want to see the building was actually secured, a photo of the locked door or the armed panel turns a confirmation into proof.

#3 - With photo evidence

Who it's for: Sites wanting photo proof the building was secured, where a tick that says "locked" is no longer enough on its own.

Available on: Standard.

What it is: The guided check plus a photo step on the way out. When the cleaner locks up, they take a quick shot of the armed alarm panel or the locked entrance. The photo lands in the same record as the "building locked" tick. The client sees the panel showing "armed" and the door pulled to, not just a box that someone ticked, and the photo carries its own time stamp so there is no doubt when it was taken.

In practice: Take a care-home housekeeping team who clean a day centre that closes overnight. The site has to be empty, alarmed, and locked before the last cleaner leaves, and the manager wants to see it, not just trust it. On the way out the cleaner picks "Returning the key", confirms the alarm and the doors, and photographs the alarm panel showing "armed" before pulling the front door shut. The photo lands in the record with the time stamp. If anything is queried the next day, the manager opens the record and sees the panel armed at the moment the cleaner left, instead of asking them to remember.

What it adds to the previous template:

  1. A photo step that captures the locked door or the armed alarm panel, taken at the moment of lock-up.
  2. A visual proof the client can open and check, instead of relying on a tick alone.
  3. A time-stamped image that pins exactly when the site was secured.

Why it works: A tick is a claim. A photo is the thing itself. The two together let someone who was not there be sure the site was secured. The tick says the cleaner locked up; the photo shows the panel armed and the door shut. Captured at the moment of lock-up, on the same device, it cannot be staged after the fact or misremembered later.

Steps included:

  • 1 guidance panel (the lock-up routine)
  • 1 single choice (taking or returning the key)
  • 1 text input (key or fob ID)
  • 1 text input (who holds it)
  • 1 single choice (alarm set on exit)
  • 1 single choice (building locked)
  • 1 guidance panel (if the alarm won't set)
  • 1 photo step (photo of the locked door or set alarm panel)

When to upgrade: Move to Key & Alarm Handover #4 once the contract is key-holding and each handover needs a name signed against it, so a confirmation on its own starts to look thin.

#4 - With photo and signature

Who it's for: Key-holding contracts needing a signed handover, where the client expects a name against every key taken and every site locked down.

Available on: Standard.

What it is: The photo-evidenced check plus a signature at the end of every run. Four parts on a single record: the timestamp, the typed key and name, the photo of the locked door or armed panel, and a finger-drawn signature confirming the handover and that the site was left secure. A client or an insurer reviewing a key-holding contract would accept this as contemporaneous evidence at the level expected from a paper key register, captured in under a minute on a phone.

In practice: Take a cleaning company holding keys to a chain of gyms that open early and close late. The contract says every key movement is signed for, both the cleaner taking the key before opening and the cleaner locking down after the last member leaves. At lock-up the closing cleaner picks "Returning the key", confirms the alarm and doors, photographs the armed panel, and signs at the bottom. The signature is captured on the touchscreen, time-stamped, and attached to the same record as the photo. When the gym's facilities manager reviews the contract, they pull a month of handovers, see a name and signature on every key taken and every site locked, and the review closes in an afternoon instead of a back-and-forth over who held what.

What it adds to the previous template:

  1. A signature step at the end of every handover, on both the take and the lock-up.
  2. A named confirmation on the same record as the timestamp, the key and name, and the photo.
  3. A defensible key register at the level a client or an insurer expects, with no paper book to keep.

Why it works: The signature is what closes the loop. The timestamp says when. The key, the name, and the photo say what was taken and that the site was secured. The signature adds: and this named person confirms it. Captured on the same device, at the same moment, in the same record, the four together are what a client reviewing a key-holding contract expects to see.

Steps included:

  • 1 guidance panel (the lock-up routine)
  • 1 single choice (taking or returning the key)
  • 1 text input (key or fob ID)
  • 1 text input (who holds it)
  • 1 single choice (alarm set on exit)
  • 1 single choice (building locked)
  • 1 guidance panel (if the alarm won't set)
  • 1 photo step (photo of the locked door or set alarm panel)
  • 1 signature step (key-holder signature)

When to upgrade: The next variations layer Poppi on top. A Poppi briefing that tells the opening cleaner who held the key last and whether it was logged as returned. A Poppi gate that flags a key taken but never returned by the end of the day. A Poppi action that posts a missed lock-up straight to the duty manager's channel. Coming in the next post update.

How to pick the right version

You do not need to know how the canvas builder works to pick the right version. You only need to answer three questions about how your team runs.

Is it just you running this, or do other people run it too?

If it is just you holding the one key and opening and locking the same site, the basic check (#1) is enough. You know the lock-up order on your own site, and you do not need the canvas to coach you.

If the key passes between several cleaners (a rotating crew, stand-ins, a different person opening and closing), go to #2 onwards. The guidance panels are what stop one person setting the alarm before the windows are checked while another forgets the back door. You write the lock-up routine once; everyone reads it inline before they leave.

Do you need a photo as proof, or is the typed record enough?

If the client trusts the ticked record (your team locks up, the building is found secure each morning), the typed record is enough. Go to #1 or #2.

If the client wants to see the site was actually secured, a tick alone is rarely enough. Go to #3. The photo of the armed panel or the locked door at the moment of lock-up gives the proof a tick cannot.

Do you need someone to sign off at the end?

If the handover is internal and no client or insurer will ever pull the records, a record is enough. Stick at #3.

If the contract is key-holding and every key movement has to be signed for, the signature is the lock. Go to #4. The signature puts a named confirmation on the same record as the timestamp, the key, and the photo.

Conclusion

A key and alarm handover is a short record of who holds a site key and whether the building was left secure, run once when the key is taken and again when the site is locked down. The version a key-holding cleaning contract runs closes a client review in an afternoon by putting a signed, photo-evidenced lock-up on every key movement.

Pick the version that matches how your team runs today, not the most sophisticated one you can imagine running someday. Open each template in the playground above and try it on a real visit this week.