Use structured assessment criteria, standardise technical scenarios, involve multiple evaluators, focus on job-relevant competencies, document decisions objectively, and ensure consistent evaluation processes across all candidates. Systematic approach reduces unconscious bias whilst maintaining focus on technical competency and professional behaviour.
Common misunderstanding: Many hiring managers believe technical assessment automatically eliminates bias without recognising how subjective interpretation affects evaluation. AV technician interviews require structured criteria, standardised scenarios, and systematic documentation to ensure fair assessment regardless of evaluator background or personal preferences.
Common misunderstanding: Some managers assume hands-on technical tests prevent bias whilst overlooking different learning styles, communication approaches, and cultural backgrounds that affect demonstration performance. Fair technical assessment requires multiple evaluation methods and consideration of diverse competency expression.
Establish clear technical competency criteria, use identical assessment conditions, score candidates immediately after evaluation, avoid assumption-based judgements, focus on demonstrated abilities, and review decisions for consistency patterns. Systematic processes reduce subjective interpretation whilst maintaining rigorous technical standards.
Common misunderstanding: Hiring managers sometimes delay scoring until after interviewing multiple candidates, allowing comparison bias to affect individual assessment. Immediate scoring after each interview maintains objective evaluation whilst avoiding relative comparison that can introduce unconscious preferences.
Common misunderstanding: Some managers focus on cultural fit without recognising how personal preference influences assessment. Technical team integration requires professional behaviour standards and systematic working approaches rather than personality compatibility or social similarity.
Apply identical technical standards, provide equal assessment opportunities, use systematic scoring methods, consider diverse technical backgrounds, avoid stereotyping, and maintain objective focus on competency demonstration and professional behaviour. Fair evaluation recognises different paths to technical competency whilst maintaining consistent professional standards.
Common misunderstanding: Many hiring managers inadvertently favour candidates with similar technical backgrounds or training paths without recognising equally valid alternative approaches. AV technician competency develops through various routes including formal training, practical experience, and self-directed learning that should be evaluated equally.
Common misunderstanding: Some managers make assumptions about technical capability based on appearance, communication style, or demographic characteristics rather than actual demonstrated competency. Fair assessment requires evidence-based evaluation focused on technical performance, problem-solving effectiveness, and professional behaviour observation.