Use technology strategically for technical demonstration, system familiarity assessment, and remote candidate evaluation. Include actual equipment operation, digital troubleshooting scenarios, and system interface interaction whilst maintaining hands-on practical assessment. Technology should enhance rather than replace direct technical competency evaluation.
Common misunderstanding: Many hiring managers assume AV technician candidates automatically excel with technology assessment tools without considering different comfort levels with unfamiliar interfaces. Technology integration should complement hands-on evaluation rather than serving as the primary assessment method for technical competency.
Common misunderstanding: Some managers rely heavily on remote technology assessment without sufficient practical equipment interaction. AV technician roles require physical equipment operation, tactile troubleshooting skills, and hands-on system management that cannot be fully evaluated through digital platforms alone.
Utilise system control interfaces, diagnostic software, technical documentation platforms, remote monitoring tools, and video conferencing for multi-location assessment whilst ensuring practical equipment interaction remains central to evaluation. Choose tools that mirror actual workplace technology whilst testing relevant technical competencies.
Common misunderstanding: Hiring managers sometimes select technology tools based on novelty rather than job relevance for AV technician assessment. Effective digital tools should reflect actual workplace systems, common troubleshooting interfaces, and typical technical documentation platforms candidates will use regularly.
Common misunderstanding: Some managers focus on advanced technology competency without assessing fundamental technical skills. AV technician success depends on systematic troubleshooting, equipment understanding, and problem-solving methodology that should be evaluated alongside technology proficiency.
Use video platforms for initial screening, virtual system tours, remote technical discussions, and scenario-based assessment whilst scheduling in-person hands-on evaluation for final selection to ensure comprehensive competency assessment. Remote interviews work well for initial evaluation but cannot replace practical technical demonstration.
Common misunderstanding: Many hiring managers attempt complete AV technician assessment through remote interviews without recognising the limitations for hands-on technical evaluation. Remote methods suit initial screening and theoretical assessment but require in-person follow-up for equipment operation and practical competency verification.
Common misunderstanding: Some managers assume video quality limitations don't affect technical assessment, overlooking how poor audio-visual connection quality impacts evaluation of communication skills and technical demonstration. Remote AV technician interviews require high-quality connections that allow clear technical discussion and adequate system demonstration visibility.