Focus on technical competency questions about system operation, troubleshooting methodology, and equipment knowledge. Include behavioural questions about pressure management and client communication during technical failures. Combine technical scenarios with real-world problem-solving challenges to assess both technical expertise and client service orientation.
Common misunderstanding: Testing theory instead of problem-solving methodology
Many hiring managers ask basic technical knowledge questions without testing problem-solving during equipment failures. You need scenario-based questions that show how candidates approach systematic troubleshooting under pressure whilst maintaining client communication.
Let's say you are interviewing an AV Technician candidate. Instead of asking "What's the difference between balanced and unbalanced audio cables?" (theory), ask "The CEO's microphone cuts out 2 minutes before their keynote speech to 500 people. Walk me through your response." This tests real problem-solving methodology under pressure.
Common misunderstanding: Focusing on specific equipment instead of adaptability
Some managers focus only on equipment familiarity instead of adaptability to different technical systems. Strong AV technician candidates show systematic diagnostic approaches that work across various equipment types, not just specific brand knowledge.
Let's say you are interviewing an AV Technician candidate who knows your exact mixing desk model but can't explain their troubleshooting process for unfamiliar equipment. This is less valuable than a candidate who demonstrates systematic diagnostic thinking that transfers across different systems.
Structure questions around real technical scenarios like equipment failures during live events, client communication during system issues, and preventative maintenance approaches. Focus on problem-solving methodology and service orientation. Ask candidates to describe specific situations where they resolved technical challenges whilst managing client expectations and maintaining event success.
Common misunderstanding: Using generic questions instead of AV-specific scenarios
Some managers ask general technical questions that don't reveal actual problem-solving behaviour. Effective behavioural questions for AV technicians must focus on real scenarios to understand their actual troubleshooting methodology and pressure management approach.
Let's say you are creating behavioural questions for an AV Technician interview. Instead of "Tell me about a time you solved a problem" (too generic), ask "Describe a time when multiple systems failed simultaneously during a high-profile event." This reveals their actual AV troubleshooting methodology and pressure management skills.
Common misunderstanding: Focusing on outcomes instead of process
Some interviewers focus only on successful technical outcomes instead of the problem-solving process. Strong AV technician behavioural questions should explore how candidates approached the challenge, what diagnostic steps they followed, and how they communicated with stakeholders.
Let's say you are interviewing an AV Technician candidate who says they "fixed a major sound issue." Don't just accept the successful outcome. Ask "Walk me through your diagnostic process step by step" and "How did you keep the client informed during troubleshooting?" The process reveals their actual technical methodology.
Use progressive scenarios starting with single system failures and escalating to multiple technical issues with time pressure. Test their ability to prioritise, communicate with clients, and maintain systematic troubleshooting approaches. Present scenarios like wireless microphone failures during keynote speeches or video display issues minutes before presentations to assess their technical triage and client management skills.
Common misunderstanding: Creating unrealistic scenarios instead of venue-specific challenges
Many hiring managers create fake technical scenarios that don't reflect actual venue challenges. Effective scenario questions should mirror your specific operational environment, using your actual equipment types and typical event pressures to assess genuine problem-solving capability.
Let's say you are interviewing AV Technician candidates for a conference centre role. Instead of "What would you do if equipment breaks?" (too vague), use your real scenarios: "In our main auditorium, the video projector overheats during summer conferences and the backup is in use elsewhere. You have 200 delegates waiting. How do you respond?" This tests real-world problem-solving.
Common misunderstanding: Starting with complex scenarios instead of building up
Some interviewers make scenarios too complex initially, overwhelming candidates instead of revealing their systematic approach. Progressive scenario questioning starts with single technical issues, then adds complexity to properly assess technical methodology and composure.
Let's say you are testing an AV Technician candidate's scenario-handling skills. Start simple: "A wireless microphone stops working during a presentation." Then build complexity: "Now add that the backup microphone also fails, the presenter becomes frustrated, and 50 VIP guests are watching." This progressive approach reveals their systematic thinking under increasing pressure.