4 best SiteDocs alternatives (2026): AI that acts inside the work, or construction safety forms, certifications and audits
I wrote this because I keep getting asked what to use instead of SiteDocs. I ran restaurants for years. I know the job: you want the floor to do the work without you chasing every check.
Nemetschek bought GoCanvas in 2024, and SiteDocs came with it. You still log into SiteDocs. You build digital safety forms, collect GPS-stamped signatures and photos, track certifications, and you can add Analytics and Workflow Studio if you buy those add-ons.
I built Pilla so you can turn a process you already know into a workflow on a canvas. Your team runs it on a phone, tablet or the web app. Pilla can fetch, decide and act while the work is happening. You keep the judgement calls.
If you want to try it on a process you already run, open the canvas.
I would pick Pilla when I want AI to act inside the work. I would keep SiteDocs when I want a construction safety programme with GPS-stamped signatures, certifications and contractor Lite. I would look at Raken when I want construction dailies, time and a safety file from one vendor.
How did we compare them?
I ask the same twelve questions I use on every vs page. For this shortlist I stayed with construction and jobsite tools. I put Pilla first because that is the product I built. Raken is the construction field product people name next to SiteDocs for dailies, time and safety. GoCanvas is the field forms platform SiteDocs sits under after Nemetschek bought GoCanvas. 4insite is the facilities Scope of Work and audit product people pick when the job is buildings and service routes. I left out office task apps, Zapier-style automation, and rota products. I read their public docs on 16 September 2026. Where they stay quiet, I stay quiet.
I am Liam Jones. I founded Pilla after more than ten years running hospitality operations, food safety and frontline teams. On 16 September 2026 I sat with SiteDocs help: Form Item Descriptions, collapsible and repeatable sections, Follow-Up Forms, Direct Chats, Location Chats, Topics, signatures, the Public API, Workflow Studio and the pricing page, then with Raken checklist templates, observations, messaging, AI photo tagging, purchasing, product releases, the public API and the trial page, GoCanvas Basic and Advanced Form Builder, Follow-Up Tasks, Workflow, Dispatch, the API and the packages page, and 4insite's homepage, solutions, pricing grid, privacy policy, 4iGo store listings and SBM's 4insite pages. 4insite does not publish a help centre. I have not lived in a paid SiteDocs, Raken, GoCanvas or 4insite account for this write-up. I am telling you what their public pages and docs say.
What should you take away?
- I would pick Pilla if I wanted the floor to follow the process without me chasing every check
- I would pick Pilla if I wanted the work checked as it comes in, and followed up when something needs me
- I would keep SiteDocs if I needed construction safety forms, certifications and contractor Lite from one vendor
- I would look at Raken if I needed signed dailies, time cards and a jobsite safety file from one vendor
How do the alternatives compare at a glance?
| Tool | Best for | What you pay for | Price from |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pilla | Operators who want AI to act inside the work | Unlimited users, usage based on workflows | Starter £49 / 500 workflows. Pro £99 / 1,000. |
| Raken | Construction crews who need signed dailies, time cards and a safety file | Quote; Basic or Performance; unlimited users claimed | No public software price. Sales quote. |
| GoCanvas | Teams that want mobile forms plus dispatch and PDF reports | Per user, billed annually; Essentials, Pro and Max | Essentials $29, Pro $39, Max $49 per user per month. 3-user minimum, billed annually. |
| 4insite | Facilities operators who want Scope of Work, audits and scorecards | $39 or $79 per user per month, or an Enterprise quote | Starter $39 per user per month. Professional $79. Enterprise quote. |
I built Pilla for AI work management on the floor. SiteDocs sells construction safety management for digital forms, certifications and audits. The other names on this page are real substitutes for part of that job, not clones.
What is SiteDocs, and why look elsewhere?
SiteDocs holds toolbox talks, JSAs, inspections, incidents and orientations as signed digital forms. You prove who signed, when and where. You flag a follow-up, keep certifications from expiring, and let a contractor sign through Lite. The field app works offline. In-app Chat covers Direct, Location and Topic rooms. Nemetschek bought GoCanvas in 2024, and SiteDocs came with it. In September 2026 you still log into SiteDocs. Help and marketing sit on sitedocs.com. SiteDocs Safety ULC is a GoCanvas company in the Nemetschek Group.
People look for a SiteDocs alternative when they want AI inside the run, a published price, video on the step, or they do not want to buy a construction safety programme from the same vendor. Some stay because that programme is the job.
I would keep SiteDocs if I needed construction safety forms, certifications and contractor Lite from one vendor. That programme is a fair reason to stay.
Price: No public software price. Sales quote.
Trial: Demo and quote. Terms mention a granted free trial. No advertised self-serve trial.
Why people stay
- Digital safety forms with GPS-stamped signatures
- Worker certifications and contractor Lite
- Follow-Up Forms and Safety Monitor
- Direct, Location and Topic chat
- Offline field app
Why people look
- No public software price
- I could not find an AI step inside a form
- I could not find a video or stored-audio form item
- I could not find live Form Logic that hides items inside a template
- Analytics and Workflow Studio are add-ons
What are the best SiteDocs alternatives?
1. Pilla
Operators who want AI to act inside the work
I built Pilla so you can turn a process you already know into a workflow on a canvas. Your team runs it on a phone, tablet or the web app. Pilla checks the work as it comes in and follows up when something needs you. You keep the judgement calls. I did not build shift scheduling, payroll, HR, certifications, contractor Lite or a COR audit file. If you need those, keep them on SiteDocs or another vendor. You can open it the same day. Starter is £49 a month with 500 processed workflows. Pro is £99 with 1,000, and adds AI automations inside Pilla. Every new account gets a 14-day trial of every Pro feature, with no card. People are unlimited.
“Pilla helps me have a day off knowing that procedures will be followed”
Charles, owner of 11 hospitality sites
Pros
- Visual canvas with branching
- Written, photo and video guidance beside each step
- DMs and group chats next to the work
- MCP server, API and integrations
- Unlimited people, billed on processed workflows
Cons
- No certifications register or contractor Lite
- No COR audit files as a programme of record
- You rebuild forms on the canvas
- Signed PDFs and history stay in SiteDocs unless you move them
Price: Starter £49 / 500 workflows. Pro £99 / 1,000. 14-day Pro trial, no card.
2. Raken
Construction crews who need signed dailies, time cards and a safety file
I would look at Raken when I want construction dailies, time and a safety file from one vendor. Superintendents and crews complete daily reports, attach photos and videos, run safety and quality checklists, log observations and incidents, and hold toolbox talks. The office reviews signed PDFs, time and production. AI on their live pages is photo tagging, time-clock Photo ID, and daily-report summaries. I could not find an AI step inside a checklist. They quote you. There is a 15-day Performance trial.
Pros
- Signed daily reports with photos and videos
- Safety and quality checklists, observations and incidents
- DMs and message channels
- Public REST API
- 15-day Performance trial
Cons
- No public software price
- I could not find an AI step inside a checklist
- I could not find a live MCP server
- Time Clock is an add-on
- I could not find a stored audio field
Price: No public software price. Sales quote. 15-day Performance trial.
3. GoCanvas
Teams that want mobile forms plus dispatch and PDF reports
I would look at GoCanvas when I want mobile forms bundled with dispatch and PDF reports. SiteDocs is a GoCanvas company after Nemetschek bought GoCanvas in 2024. You still log into SiteDocs separately. On GoCanvas you turn paper work orders, inspections and daily reports into mobile forms, dispatch the next job, and get a PDF back. Max adds Follow-Up Tasks on failed checks. I could not find DMs or group chats in their help. Essentials is $29 per user per month, billed annually, with a three-user minimum.
Pros
- Form builders with screens, conditions and loops
- Dispatch, workflow handoffs and Follow-Up Tasks on Max
- Public Essentials, Pro and Max prices
- Offline capture on mobile
Cons
- You pay per user, with a three-user minimum billed annually
- I could not find an AI step inside a submission
- I could not find DMs or group chats
- I could not find a video-guidance step
- I could not find an MCP server
Price: Essentials $29, Pro $39, Max $49 per user per month. 3-user minimum, billed annually.
4. 4insite
Facilities operators who want Scope of Work, audits and scorecards
I would look at 4insite when I want a facilities suite for Scope of Work, audits, work orders and scorecards. 4insite LLC was founded in 2019 with SBM Management as the primary user. You still log into app.4insite.com. The public floor app is 4iGo. You load a Scope of Work, run routes and audits, and you prove service with QR, photos and attestations. I could not find a public help centre or an MCP server. Starter is $39 per user per month on the public card.
Pros
- Scope of Work, routes, audits and scorecards
- Public Starter and Professional prices
- Service validation with QR, photos and attestations
- Olivia for occupant requests and dashboard summaries
Cons
- You pay per user
- I could not find DMs or group channels
- I could not find a public help centre
- I could not find a public API reference or MCP server
- No advertised self-serve trial
Price: Starter $39 per user per month. Professional $79. Enterprise quote.
Which should you pick?
If I ran a construction safety programme that needed GPS-stamped signatures, certifications and contractor Lite from one vendor, I would keep SiteDocs. That programme is a fair reason to stay. If I wanted the work drawn on a canvas and AI acting inside the run, with video on the step and MCP, I would use Pilla, and I would keep certifications and contractor Lite somewhere else. If the job is signed dailies, time cards and a jobsite safety file, I would look at Raken. If the job is field forms with dispatch and PDFs, I would look at GoCanvas.
Frequently asked questions
What is the best SiteDocs alternative?
I would pick Pilla if I wanted the floor to follow a process, with the work checked as it comes in. I would keep SiteDocs if I needed construction safety forms, certifications and contractor Lite from one vendor. I would look at Raken for signed dailies, time cards and a jobsite safety file, GoCanvas for mobile forms plus dispatch and PDF reports, and 4insite for facilities Scope of Work, audits and scorecards.
Is SiteDocs still SiteDocs after GoCanvas and Nemetschek?
Yes. Nemetschek bought GoCanvas in 2024, and SiteDocs came with it. In September 2026 the product is still SiteDocs. Help and marketing sit on sitedocs.com. SiteDocs Safety ULC is a GoCanvas company in the Nemetschek Group.
How much do these SiteDocs alternatives cost?
SiteDocs quotes you. I could not find a public software price. Pilla is Starter at £49 a month with 500 processed workflows, and Pro at £99 with 1,000. People are unlimited. Raken quotes you, with a 15-day Performance trial. GoCanvas publishes Essentials at $29, Pro at $39 and Max at $49 per user per month, with a three-user minimum billed annually. 4insite publishes Starter at $39 and Professional at $79 per user per month, then quotes Enterprise.
Does switching from SiteDocs replace certifications, contractor Lite or COR audit files?
No. I did not build Pilla as a construction safety programme of record. If you need SiteDocs certifications, contractor Lite or COR audit files, keep those on SiteDocs or another product. Raken holds a jobsite safety file next to dailies and time. GoCanvas is field forms with dispatch and PDFs. 4insite is facilities Scope of Work and scorecards.
Does SiteDocs have AI inside forms?
I could not find an AI step inside a form. Checking is a mandatory item, a pass/fail, a photo and a supervisor signature. Homepage and Analytics pages describe AI callouts, smart suggestions and written chart explanations on dashboards. Workflow Studio can run after a form is signed. Help says it cannot fill answers.
How did you pick this shortlist?
I stayed with construction and jobsite tools and used the same twelve questions I use on every vs page. I read public docs on 16 September 2026. I left out office task apps, Zapier-style automation, and rota products. The deep tables live on the vs pages linked from each name.
Where did these facts come from?
SiteDocs and peer claims on this page come from their own public docs. Pilla claims come from the current product.
- SiteDocs Form Item Descriptions
- Follow-Up Forms
- What is included in a SiteDocs signature
- Direct Chats
- SiteDocs Public API
- What is Workflow Studio
- SiteDocs pricing
- SiteDocs company profile
- Nemetschek acquired GoCanvas, including SiteDocs
- What is Raken
- How to build Raken checklist templates
- Raken request pricing
- Raken 15-day Performance trial
- GoCanvas packages
- What is GoCanvas
- 4insite pricing
- 4insite solutions
- Pilla pricing
Pilla is AI work management for deskless teams. Try every Pro feature free for 14 days, with no card. Start a free trial or visit SiteDocs.
Pilla vs SiteDocs · See all comparisons · How Pilla works · Pricing