Pilla vs Stack AI
Stack AI is an enterprise AI agent that reads and writes across SharePoint, Salesforce and SAP. Pilla is an enterprise AI workflow that reads and writes across your frontline staff.
Compared against Stack AI's own documentation on 21st May 2026
The short version
Choose Pilla if
Pilla wins when the buyer is running deskless or frontline operations and needs the workflow itself to be the product, not the back-office automation behind it.
Choose Stack AI if
Stack AI wins when the buyer is a large enterprise IT or compliance leader looking to deploy AI agents across many existing enterprise systems, with strict governance requirements.
Pricing
Pilla
Usage-based pricing. From £29 per month for 1,000 workflow steps, scaling up to £1,749 per month for 1 million steps. Free to start, no per-seat fees. See full pricing.
Stack AI
Free: 500 runs/mo, 2 projects, 1 seat. Enterprise: custom seats/runs (no middle tier).
At a glance
| Capability | Pilla | Stack AI |
|---|---|---|
| Drag and drop canvas to build workflows | Yes | Yes |
| 20 different types of input workflow steps | Yes | No |
| Mobile app to carry out workflow inputs | Yes | No |
| AI workflow steps to automate actions | Yes | Yes |
| Unlimited teams and users | Yes | Not documented |
| In-app user messaging and chats | Yes | No |
How Stack AI positions itself
Stack AI calls itself the "Platform for Enterprise AI" and frames the product as "AI Agents for the Enterprise". The pitch is governance-first: a no-code drag-and-drop canvas where IT, ops, finance, compliance and customer-service teams build AI agents that read and write across 100+ enterprise systems (SharePoint, Salesforce, Workday, SAP, Snowflake, Jira). Stack AI leans heavily on its enterprise credentials — SOC 2 Type II, HIPAA, GDPR, on-prem and VPC deployment, RBAC, SSO, exportable audit logs, dedicated solution engineers — and is trusted by Fortune 500s, banks, healthcare providers and institutions like MIT Sloan.
When teams choose Stack AI
Stack AI wins when the buyer is a large enterprise IT or compliance leader looking to deploy AI agents across many existing enterprise systems, with strict governance requirements. Its strengths are real: 100+ native OAuth integrations to SAP, Workday, SharePoint, Salesforce, Snowflake; on-prem / VPC deployment for data-sovereignty; eight layers of governance control; SOC 2 Type II, HIPAA and GDPR; dedicated solution engineers who help build workflows. Technical teams also appreciate the Python node, custom API tools, and 30+ LLM providers. If the job-to-be-done is "deploy agents that read/write across our existing enterprise stack with full audit trails", Stack AI is a strong fit.
When Pilla wins
Pilla wins when the buyer is running deskless or frontline operations and needs the workflow itself to be the product, not the back-office automation behind it. Stack AI has no mobile-first capture surface (no photo/video/audio/signature/location/clock-in field types), no checklist or rating step, no native single/multi-choice or date/time pickers, and no in-product chat between coworkers — its end-user surfaces are chatbots, forms, Slack/Teams bots, and APIs. Pilla ships these as first-class workflow steps with messages linked to runs, issue reporting mid-flow, push notifications, and frontline-friendly mobile workflows. If the job is "give a deskless team an AI-assisted SOP they can run from mobile or tablet", Stack AI is structurally the wrong shape.
Full feature comparison
| Pilla | Stack AI | |
|---|---|---|
| Workflows | ||
| Recurring workflow templates | Yes | Yes |
| Ad-hoc workflow creation | Yes | Yes |
| Reusable workflow blueprints | Yes | Yes |
| Reusable element templates | Yes | Yes |
| Custom tags & categories | Yes | Yes |
| Issue reporting on workflows | Yes | No |
| Activity audit trail | Yes | Yes |
| Public template library | Yes | Yes |
| Public forms (external submissions) | Yes | Yes |
| CSV data exports | Yes | Yes |
| Bulk operations | Yes | Not documented |
| Template impact analysis | Yes | No |
| Template analytics & insights | Yes | Yes |
| Input Steps | ||
| Text input | Yes | Yes |
| Number input | Yes | Not documented |
| Date input | Yes | Not documented |
| Time input | Yes | Not documented |
| Location / clock-in input | Yes | No |
| Checklist | Yes | No |
| Single-choice input | Yes | Not documented |
| Multi-choice input | Yes | Not documented |
| Cascading select | Yes | No |
| Rating scale | Yes | Not documented |
| Photo input | Yes | No |
| Video input | Yes | No |
| Audio note / input | Yes | No |
| File input | Yes | Yes |
| Signature input | Yes | No |
| Guidance Steps | ||
| Rich text guidance | Yes | Not documented |
| Video guidance | Yes | No |
| Photo guidance | Yes | No |
| AI Steps | ||
| AI context briefing step | Yes | Yes |
| AI decision gate step | Yes | Yes |
| AI decision tree step | Yes | Yes |
| AI automated action step | Yes | Yes |
| Communication | ||
| In-app 1:1 direct messages | Yes | No |
| Group team chats | Yes | No |
| Team-wide broadcasts | Yes | No |
| Photo, video & file attachments | Yes | No |
| Threaded replies | Yes | No |
| Emoji reactions | Yes | No |
| @mention teammates | Yes | No |
| Read receipts | Yes | No |
| Push notifications on new message | Yes | No |
| Messages linked to workflows | Yes | No |
| In-app agent | ||
| Plain-English Q&A on how it works | Yes | Yes |
| In-product walkthroughs and tutorials | Yes | Not documented |
| Saved chat history & resumable sessions | Yes | Yes |
| Cites help docs and source data | Yes | Yes |
| File feedback, bugs & feature requests from chat | Yes | Not documented |
| Q&A on your workflows | Yes | Not documented |
| Q&A on your team's performance | Yes | Not documented |
| Q&A across connected integrations | Yes | Yes |
| Integrations & API | ||
| Native integrations | Yes | Yes |
| 100+ MCP integrations | Yes | Not documented |
| Public REST API | Yes | Yes |
| Outbound webhooks | Yes | Not documented |
| MCP server (connect Claude / Cursor / other) | Yes | No |
| IP allowlist on API keys | Yes | Not documented |
| Custom API rate limits | Yes | Not documented |
| Administration | ||
| User roles (staff / manager / admin) | Yes | Yes |
| CSV user & team import | Yes | Not documented |
| Tenant-isolated data | Yes | Yes |
| Account-wide audit logs | Yes | Yes |
| Custom step run allowances | Yes | Yes |
| Annual step run pooling | Yes | Not documented |
| SSO & SAML | Yes | Yes |
| SCIM provisioning | Yes | Not documented |
| Dedicated success manager | Yes | Yes |
| Custom onboarding | Yes | Yes |
| Service-level agreement (SLA) | Yes | Not documented |
Frequently asked questions
- Is Pilla a good Stack AI alternative?
- Pilla wins when the buyer is running deskless or frontline operations and needs the workflow itself to be the product, not the back-office automation behind it.
- What can Pilla do that Stack AI can't?
- Checked against Stack AI's own documentation, Pilla offers issue reporting on workflows, template impact analysis, location / clock-in input, checklist, and cascading select — none of which Stack AI documents.
- When should I choose Stack AI over Pilla?
- Stack AI wins when the buyer is a large enterprise IT or compliance leader looking to deploy AI agents across many existing enterprise systems, with strict governance requirements.
- How much does Pilla cost compared to Stack AI?
- Pilla is priced on usage, not seats. Plans start free and scale from £29 per month for 1,000 workflow steps up to 1 million steps a month, so you only pay for what your team and Poppi actually run. Stack AI offers a free tier; paid pricing is quote-only.
Run your workflows where the work happens
Pilla is a workflow automation app. Start free, no credit card needed.