Test basic knife skills, simple recipe following, and kitchen organisation over 45 minutes whilst focusing on safety awareness, learning responsiveness, and foundational technique rather than advanced culinary skills. Assess development potential through practical demonstration and instruction response.
Common misunderstanding: Testing advanced techniques inappropriate for entry-level roles
Many hiring managers test advanced techniques that don't match entry-level roles. They don't focus on foundation skills, safety practices, and learning ability that predict success in commis chef positions.
Let's say you are conducting a practical trial for a commis chef candidate and ask them to prepare a complex sauce or advanced dish. This approach tests skills beyond their expected level and might discourage good candidates who could excel with proper training from senior kitchen staff.
Common misunderstanding: Conducting impractical trials without realistic kitchen conditions
Some managers run trials that don't match real kitchen conditions. They miss chances to see how candidates handle the actual work environment, equipment, and operational demands.
Let's say you are testing a commis chef candidate in a quiet, empty kitchen instead of during actual service preparation. You might miss seeing how they cope with the noise, heat, pace, and pressure of working alongside senior chefs during busy periods.
Evaluate knife safety and basic cuts, recipe comprehension, mise en place organisation, and feedback implementation whilst including simple cooking techniques and cleanliness maintenance throughout assessment. Focus on foundational competencies rather than complex culinary skills.
Common misunderstanding: Testing complex techniques beyond entry-level requirements
Hiring managers sometimes test complex techniques that go beyond entry-level needs. They don't realise that commis chef assessment should focus on basic skills, safety awareness, and learning foundation.
Let's say you are asking a commis chef candidate to demonstrate advanced knife work like precise brunoise cuts under time pressure. Instead, test basic safety practices, proper knife grip, and willingness to learn from corrections given by senior kitchen staff.
Common misunderstanding: Overlooking organisation and cleanliness assessment
Some managers don't check organisation and cleanliness properly. They miss evaluating basic work habits, station management, and professional practices that greatly affect kitchen integration and training success.
Let's say you are watching a commis chef candidate during practical trials but only focus on their cooking skills. If you don't observe how they keep their station clean, organise their mise en place, or follow hygiene protocols, you might hire someone who struggles with the daily standards expected in professional kitchens.
Observe improvement during trial period, response to instruction, and question quality whilst testing technique correction implementation and willingness to practice new skills with guidance. Assess development trajectory rather than initial performance level for accurate potential prediction.
Common misunderstanding: Judging candidates on starting skill level
Hiring managers sometimes judge candidates only on their starting skill level. They don't assess learning curve, improvement speed, and how well candidates respond to instruction.
Let's say you are evaluating a commis chef candidate who struggles with basic knife cuts at first but shows rapid improvement when senior chefs give guidance. Focusing only on initial performance might make you miss a candidate with excellent learning potential and strong development capacity.
Common misunderstanding: Missing learning evaluation opportunities
Some managers miss chances to evaluate learning during trials. They don't include teaching moments that show how candidates receive feedback, adapt to new information, and show genuine interest in skill development.
Let's say you are running a practical trial for a commis chef candidate but don't provide any instruction or feedback during the process. Without these teaching moments, you can't see how they respond to guidance from senior chefs or whether they actively seek to improve their techniques.