Structure interviews focusing on practical cooking demonstration, service pressure simulation, and kitchen teamwork assessment whilst emphasising hands-on evaluation over conversation. Prioritise cooking trials and speed assessment matching kitchen service demands.
Common misunderstanding: Using standard interview formats for practical roles.
Many hiring managers use talking-based interviews for Line Cook positions when they should focus on hands-on cooking demonstration. Line Cooks need practical skills, not just interview conversation abilities.
Let's say you are interviewing a Line Cook candidate. Instead of spending an hour talking about cooking experience, spend 10 minutes on questions and 45 minutes watching them cook under pressure. This tests their actual cooking ability rather than their speaking skills.
Common misunderstanding: Assuming good talkers make good cooks.
Some managers think candidates who describe cooking well will automatically be good at actual cooking under pressure. But talking about cooking is different from executing dishes quickly during service.
Let's say you are comparing Line Cook candidates. One explains cooking techniques perfectly but struggles during the practical test. Another explains less clearly but cooks efficiently under pressure. The second candidate shows the practical skills your kitchen needs during busy service.
Use format combining brief behavioural assessment with extensive practical cooking trial whilst focusing on kitchen station demonstration. Include service pressure simulation and team coordination evaluation.
Common misunderstanding: Spending too much time talking instead of cooking.
Hiring managers often design interviews with lots of conversation when Line Cook work is mainly practical. Talking about cooking doesn't predict cooking performance during busy service periods.
Let's say you are designing a Line Cook interview format. Instead of 60 minutes of questions, use 15 minutes for basic questions and 45 minutes for practical cooking demonstration. This shows you how they actually perform under kitchen pressure, not just how they discuss cooking.
Common misunderstanding: Skipping practical demonstrations to save time.
Some managers avoid cooking demonstrations because they take longer than regular interviews. But Line Cook work is hands-on, so you need to see their cooking skills in action.
Let's say you are hiring a Line Cook but feel a cooking trial takes too much time. Line cooking requires speed, multitasking, and pressure management that you can only observe through practical demonstration. Schedule the cooking trial - it's the most important part of evaluating Line Cook candidates.
Schedule 60-90 minutes total with 45 minutes for practical cooking demonstration whilst allocating majority time to hands-on assessment. Include brief conversation, extended cooking trial, and team integration evaluation.
Common misunderstanding: Using standard one-hour interview timing for practical roles.
Hiring managers often stick to standard interview timing when Line Cook assessment needs longer for proper cooking demonstration. Quick interviews don't reveal cooking skills under pressure.
Let's say you are scheduling Line Cook interviews. Instead of standard 30-minute slots, book 90 minutes to include proper cooking demonstration. This lets you see their speed, technique, and pressure management - the skills that matter most for line cooking success.
Common misunderstanding: Avoiding longer assessments because they seem complicated.
Some managers keep Line Cook interviews short to make them simple, but cooking skills need proper time to evaluate. Quick assessments miss important abilities like multitasking and pressure management.
Let's say you are worried about making Line Cook interviews too long or complex. But line cooking involves managing multiple orders simultaneously under time pressure. Extended practical assessment reveals who can handle real kitchen demands versus who only looks good in short interviews.