Use technology strategically for service demonstration recording, coordination assessment, and remote candidate evaluation whilst maintaining hands-on practical assessment. Include point-of-sale system interaction, service timing tools, and coordination platforms whilst ensuring practical service demonstration remains central to evaluation.
Common misunderstanding: All candidates are comfortable with technology assessment
Many hiring managers assume banquet server candidates automatically excel with technology assessment tools without considering different comfort levels with unfamiliar systems. Technology integration should complement rather than replace hands-on evaluation.
Let's say you are using a tablet-based assessment system. Some excellent servers might struggle with the technology whilst weaker candidates appear more capable simply because they're comfortable with digital tools.
Common misunderstanding: Remote assessment covers all service requirements
Some managers rely heavily on remote technology assessment without sufficient practical service interaction. Service roles require physical presentation, coordination skills, and hands-on competency that need in-person evaluation.
Let's say you are conducting video interviews for banquet servers. You might miss crucial details like posture, movement efficiency, or how they handle physical service tasks that significantly impact guest experience.
Utilise point-of-sale systems, service timing applications, coordination platforms, and video conferencing for multi-location assessment whilst ensuring practical service interaction remains central to evaluation.
Common misunderstanding: Newer technology means better assessment
Hiring managers sometimes select technology tools based on novelty rather than job relevance. Effective digital tools should reflect actual workplace systems and common service technologies used in banquet operations.
Let's say you are using a sophisticated assessment app when your venue actually uses basic point-of-sale systems. The candidate's struggle with complex technology doesn't predict their success with your simpler workplace tools.
Common misunderstanding: Technology skills predict service excellence
Some managers focus on advanced technology competency without assessing fundamental service skills. Success depends on systematic service methodology and guest interaction excellence rather than digital proficiency.
Let's say you are impressed by a candidate's ability to navigate complex software quickly. This doesn't guarantee they can provide attentive service, handle guest requests professionally, or coordinate effectively during busy events.
Use video platforms for initial screening, virtual venue tours, remote service discussions, and scenario-based assessment whilst scheduling in-person hands-on evaluation for final selection to ensure comprehensive competency assessment.
Common misunderstanding: Remote interviews provide complete assessment
Many hiring managers attempt complete service assessment through remote interviews without recognising limitations for hands-on service evaluation. Physical service skills require in-person assessment for accurate evaluation.
Let's say you are conducting remote interviews for efficiency. You might miss how candidates handle serving trays, their physical coordination, or their actual presence and professionalism in service situations.
Common misunderstanding: Video quality doesn't affect assessment accuracy
Some managers assume video quality limitations don't affect service assessment, overlooking how poor connections impact evaluation of presentation standards and service demonstration visibility.
Let's say you are interviewing a well-presented candidate whose video keeps freezing or has poor audio. You might unfairly judge their communication skills or miss important visual cues about their professionalism.