Evaluate operational knowledge, systems competency, inventory management understanding, quality control expertise, beverage programme knowledge, and technology proficiency whilst focusing on management oversight capabilities rather than individual task execution.
Common misunderstanding: Testing hands-on skills instead of management oversight abilities
Many hiring managers test hands-on technical skills instead of management oversight and systematic thinking. Bar Managers coordinate teams and systems, they don't do every task themselves.
Let's say you are assessing a Bar Manager candidate's technical skills. You test their ability to operate the coffee machine or mix cocktails perfectly. But Bar Managers train others to do these tasks whilst focusing on managing quality, costs, and team performance. Test management oversight, not personal task execution.
Common misunderstanding: Focusing on bartending skills instead of operational management
Some managers focus extensively on bartending techniques without assessing operational management competency and business understanding. Bar Managers need leadership skills, not just drink-making abilities.
Let's say you are testing a Bar Manager candidate's technical knowledge. You spend time asking about cocktail recipes, garnish techniques, and drink presentation. But Bar Managers succeed through inventory control, staff training, cost management, and quality systems. Test operational management, not bartending craftsmanship.
Test inventory management systems, cost control procedures, quality standards, service coordination, supplier relationships, and operational efficiency whilst focusing on management oversight and systematic improvement rather than individual task execution.
Common misunderstanding: Testing detailed technical knowledge instead of strategic thinking
Some hiring managers test detailed technical knowledge without assessing management perspective and strategic thinking. Bar Managers need broad operational understanding, not deep technical expertise in every area.
Let's say you are evaluating a Bar Manager candidate's operational knowledge. You ask specific details about equipment maintenance or exact procedures for stock rotation. Instead ask "How do you ensure consistent quality across all operations?" and "What systems prevent operational problems?" Strategic oversight matters more than technical details.
Common misunderstanding: Assuming operational experience means management competency
Some managers assume operational experience means management competency without testing systematic thinking and process improvement capability. Doing tasks well doesn't automatically mean managing them effectively.
Let's say you are interviewing a Bar Manager candidate with extensive operational experience. You assume "They know operations, so they can manage them." But managing operations requires systematic thinking, process improvement, and team coordination. Test their ability to improve systems, not just operate within them.
Assess point-of-sale systems, inventory management software, financial reporting tools, scheduling systems, and communication platforms whilst testing adaptation capability and management application rather than technical expertise.
Common misunderstanding: Testing specific software knowledge instead of learning ability
Many hiring managers test specific software knowledge instead of learning capability and adaptation skills. Technology changes rapidly, and managers must learn new systems regularly.
Let's say you are assessing a Bar Manager candidate's technology skills. You focus on their experience with your specific POS system or inventory software. But more important is their ability to learn new technology quickly and train others. Test learning capability and technology management, not specific software expertise.
Common misunderstanding: Overvaluing technology skills compared to leadership abilities
Some managers overemphasise technology competency compared to leadership and business management capabilities. Technology skills are useful, but leadership abilities create much greater business value.
Let's say you are choosing between Bar Manager candidates. One candidate has excellent technology skills but struggles with team development questions. Another candidate shows strong leadership but limited technology experience. The leadership candidate will likely succeed better because technology can be learned, but management abilities are harder to develop.
Evaluate product knowledge, menu development understanding, pricing strategies, supplier relationships, and quality control systems whilst focusing on management coordination and business impact rather than detailed product expertise.
Common misunderstanding: Testing product knowledge instead of business understanding
Some hiring managers test detailed beverage knowledge instead of management oversight and commercial understanding. Bar Managers need business focus for profitable operations, not expert product knowledge.
Let's say you are assessing a Bar Manager candidate's beverage programme knowledge. You test their knowledge of specific wine regions, brewing processes, or cocktail history. But Bar Managers succeed through menu profitability analysis, supplier negotiations, and quality systems. Test business application, not product expertise.
Common misunderstanding: Assuming product expertise equals programme management ability
Some managers assume extensive product knowledge means effective programme management without testing business focus and profit optimisation capability. Knowing products doesn't guarantee profitable programme leadership.
Let's say you are interviewing a Bar Manager candidate with impressive beverage knowledge. They discuss wine varietals and cocktail techniques expertly. But can they analyse menu profitability, negotiate supplier contracts, or develop cost-effective programmes? Product knowledge without business application doesn't create management success.